>>> Guido van Rossum wrote > > 2. Since this is marked new in 2.3: Is it planned to backport > > this stuff into the 2.2.x series? > > Requiring Python 2.3 for my stuff seems a but harsh currently... > > I don't plan to backport this to 2.2 unless there's an overwhelming > demand. I'd suggest that this _isn't_ the sort of thing that should be going into 2.2. Aside from the amount of work - I'm guessing it'd be a bit - the notion of adding stuff like this to a maintenance/bugfix release seems, to me, to be stretching the meaning of the term maintenance release. Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony@interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4