"Martin v. Loewis" wrote: > > Since this appears to be religious, I'm backing the patch out. Thanks. Please note that there's nothing religious about this: if you come up with a counting version of the codec which has similar performance or is even faster, I'd have no objections at all about your checkin. BTW, you could easily add your codec to the Python codec registry as e.g. 'utf8alt'. People could then enable it on memory starved machines by editing the codec alias list in encodings/aliases.py. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4