/me attempts to avoid HTML-mail. +1 for numer() in the short run, but I don't know if I get a vote yet. I don't know if it's too late yet, but what PEP 279 really seems to want is iterator comprehensions. I have wanted those myself for a bit of a while. If nobody minds, how about these classes: Counter -> iterator over unbounded arithmetic sequence, with specified start and optional arbitrary step. IterComp -> convert a transform function, a list of iterators and an optional selection function into a new lazy iterator, using comprehension-type semantics. Expect frequent use of lambdas. Wait! Isn't this just like programming with streams? Is there room in the python model for an explicit stream type? (Yes, it's called a generator. Perhaps we should just use those wisely.)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4