Alex Martelli wrote:
> Apart from this, "indices" suggests you're getting ONLY indices --
> while when you iterate on this type you get indices AND contents.
Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> Ah, I misunderstood what this unnamed function does. I was thinking it
> works like .keys() on dictionaries. You're telling me it works like
> ..items(). In that case I don't like enumerate() or itemize(). :-(
Eh, this is the definition from the PEP:
def enumerate(collection):
'Generates an indexed series: (0,coll[0]), (1,coll[1]) ...'
i = 0
it = iter(collection)
while 1:
yield (i, it.next())
i += 1
(And enumerate() gets a +1 from me.)
Just
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4