Guido van Rossum wrote: > >... > > I'm +/- 0 on this. It saves a letter and may indeed suggest numbering > more closely, but it's an even more obscure word than enumerate(). Is not obscurity a sort of virtue? If it hasn't been used in the languages space then it has no mental baggage. Compare with "Big endian", as obscure a reference as you'll find in computer science, I think. Or "thunk": a made-up word. Paul Prescod
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4