On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Patrick K. O'Brien wrote: > > The new type is a numerator but that is a mouthful so the built-in > function should be named numer(), just like iter() is short for > iterator. If people can learn and remember iter(), it should be just > as easy to learn and remember numer(). They are spelled almost the > same, they rhyme, they are short, etc. All the logic that lead to the > selection of iter() should apply here. Hrm. I'm not quite changing my vote yet, but numerator() might work; I don't like numer() because it looks like it's missing a "b". I'm also rethinking whether I should cast my vote for iterindexed(). -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ What if there were no rhetorical questions?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4