On Wednesday 24 April 2002 07:02, Greg Ewing wrote: ... > There doesn't seem to be any single English word that > captures all of what we mean without ambiguity. Not a single VERB -- adjective "numbered" might do. Unfortunately the verb "to number" (from which the adjective comes as the past participle) is ambiguous when used as a function name (as noun "number" confusingly comes to mind instead, since it's an usage vastly more common). Alex
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4