Martin v. Loewis writes: > That shouldn't stop you from doing it. I'm planning to regenerate the > cache on a regular basis (through cron). This isn't implemented yet, > but when it is, few people should ever notice problems. Barry & I took a quick look at the redirector earlier. It looks like just removing the cache occaisionally should be sufficient. The more I think about the other alternatives we discussed, the more I don't think it's worth it. Perhaps we should think about the number of hits the redirector gets. Is it really large enough to bother with re-populating the pre-computed list. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4