[Somebody] > > > If that were the only issue, what's the point of maintaining a > > > list in the PEP at all? [Guido] > > Beats me. Maybe because the PEP author thought deprecating whole > > modules was a heavier kind of operation? Maybe because he didn't > > realize other things could be deprecated as well? Maybe because he > > planned a separate PEP for those? [The PEP author] > He thought that it was indeed desirable to have a consolidated list of > all deprecated stuff, together with a rationale, so that people could > easily oppose the rationale. That idea never caught on. > > It's not really necessary to maintain that consolidated list *in* the > PEP; any other place would be fine as well - but it needs to be a > single list, and it needs to be maintained. Well, it seems we finally all agree on what needs to be done. I'm guessing it's up to Fred to implement it. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4