[Guido] > Tim has both Win2K vs. Win98, and it makes little difference; he's got > the same environment on both. I've seen him work. The huge differences here between 2K and 98 are system stability and native shell power. Both are much better on 2K. > IMO, the debugger (VC++) and editor (not VC) he uses are much better > than anything I've seen on Unix -- Mine too, and I used to be an Emacs wizard. I'm afraid if I ever went back to Unix, I'd spend the first three months adding a massive subsystem to Emacs to get back all the C smarts Source Insight has <0.2 wink -- but I really do fear that!>. > but the tools he has to use to interact with CVS are > much worse. > > (He'll probably deny this, so I'll stop. :-) Nope, I fully agree on all counts, except that Win98 is substantially feebler (than W2K) in two ways that count. There are better CVS tools for Windows, but for some reason I never gave up my command-line junkie nature, despite landing on a system with a spectacularly lame shell. "Doing something about that" has been on my todo list since 1994 <0.5 wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4