>>>>> "SM" == Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> writes:
SM> How about "optionparser" or "optionlib"?
BAW> I really think we should expose Optik's main parser class
BAW> through getopt, which we'd make into a package. I didn't see
BAW> any response to my previous suggestion, does everybody else
BAW> hate it? ;)
SM> I assume this can be done without changing the apparent
SM> interface to the getopt class? That is, if I import getopt
SM> will getopt.getopt still reference what getopt.getopt does
SM> today?
Yes. Move getopt.py to getopt/_getopt.py and put this in
getopt/__init__.py:
# For backwards compatibility
from _getopt import getopt, error, GetoptError
# For convenience
from OptionParser import OptionParser
so some such similar incantation (I don't remember off-hand whether
the module names should be fully-qualified or not).
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4