guido wrote: > I'm proposing to accept PEP 278 and let Jack check it in. > > There will probably be some small issues with the code (though it > passes the test suite on my Linux box), but I expect the only way to > tease those out is to check it in first. > > Jack did an admirable job of answering all questions about the patch, > adding doc patches and unit tests, and so on. > > Unless there's significant uproar about this within 48 hours, I'll > approve the PEP. I maintain that a separate constructor (e.g. textfile) would be a much cleaner solution. it's a completely different kind of file object, after all. other than that, I see no problems with concept and implementation (you should have done it this way from the start ;-) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4