> [Barry A. Warsaw] > > My very limited Tim-enlightened understanding is that encoding a string > > to UTF-8 should never produce a string with NULs. [François] > Besides the fact that NULs encode to themselves. In fact, 0-127 encode to > themselves, and are never produced otherwise. Also, 254 and 255 are never > produced, I heard that some use these to escape out within an UTF-8 string. Hm, but isn't there a way to encode a NUL that doesn't produce a NUL? In some variant? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4