[Barry A. Warsaw] > My very limited Tim-enlightened understanding is that encoding a string > to UTF-8 should never produce a string with NULs. Besides the fact that NULs encode to themselves. In fact, 0-127 encode to themselves, and are never produced otherwise. Also, 254 and 255 are never produced, I heard that some use these to escape out within an UTF-8 string. -- François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4