"Patrick K. O'Brien" wrote: > > [Neal Norwitz] > > > > "Patrick K. O'Brien" wrote: > > > > > What I think is needed is a list of what is missing > > > > The list is quite large. Skip the rest of this messge for those > > who are uninterested. The list contains both python modules > > as well as C modules. Please let me know about mistakes. > > [big list of modules missing unit tests] > > Thanks for the list. I'm curious now. Where did this list come from? Is it > actively maintained? If we start adding the missing unit tests is there a > way to maintain this list? I pulled it from where the sun don't shine. :-) I did a bunch of ls/grep/echo/... commands. Then post processed manually. It's not maintained anywhere. It would be great if there was a place to maintain/update it. Suggestions? I have another script which builds python with test-coverage and will tell you each line/function that doesn't get executed in case you get really bored. :-) There's only about 200 functions in Objects/*.c. Neal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4