aahz wrote: > How about 2.3.a, 2.3.b, 2.3.c, ... as the experimental releases; 2.3.0 > would then be the first stable release. That would give us a simple rule: Production users should strictly avoid any release number that isn't all numbers. Paul Hughett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4