[Tim] >> I expect so, but it's gotten confused. Since I got up today <wink>, >> >> + I'm building a 2.1.3 Windows installer too. [Guido] > Which you offered to do earlier this weekend. Sure, but it was left undecided then -- I offer to do a lot of things it turns out nobody wants <wink>. >> + I believe we're no longer uploading anything to SF, although I'm >> not sure Michael and Anthony both believe that. > AFAIK they were cc'ed on the msgs where that was decided. Then perhaps I wasn't. I only deduced it indirectly from one piece of email that *suggested* it might be the case, buried in a layer or two of quoting. So I believe it's prudent to make sure everyone who was supposed to get that email actually did (esp. since I don't believe I did, unless it's hiding in one of the 100+ new "stability" emails I haven't had time to open yet). >> + A very recent msg from Guido said we were releasing 2.2.1 today >> too, which is ahead of Michael's schedule (in response to the >> 2.1.3 Windows semi-surprise, I had intended to push 2.2.1 Windows >> off to Tuesday night). > Fine with me. I didn't mean the reference to "tonight" as a directive > to the release manager, it was what *I* believed, sorry if I was > wrong. This is Michael's call. Cool. Michael has stuck to his release schedule since announcing it, and I see no reason we can't meet it.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4