On Mon, Apr 08, 2002, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > Part of the problem is implementation details (i.e. avoiding the use > of Python 2.2 features in standalone, but not in the Python cvs > tree). Part of it is due to the nature of distutils package layout > (i.e. you need to put setup.py, README, etc. someplace, and distutils > seems to strongly discourage it being in th epackage). Part of it's > also that I feel I have more leeway to change things in the standalone > package. > > But at some point it will stop making sense to distribute a separate > package. Hrm. But until it's no longer a separate package, why use 2.2-specific features in the builtin package? -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "There are times when effort is important and necessary, but this should not be taken as any kind of moral imperative." --jdecker
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4