> Note that Jim often brings up his opinion that the /only/ way to > guarantee Zope Z.Y.Z works on Python X.Y.Z is to distribute Python > with Zope. But I don't think that's what we do any more. We just tell them to use 2.1.2. > (This harkens back to JWZ's much earlier opinion that > Netscape could never ship using dynamic libraries, because you really > can't trust anything about the end user's system). We're really > touching on much deeper flaws in software development, with no good > answers, IMO. I've started to call it the Logajan paradox: he wants his cake (zero backwards incompatibilities) and eat it too (releases with new features). It can't be done. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4