On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:30:10PM -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>Cheap shots aside, another possibility would be to simply start
>*every* minor (2.x) release off as unstable, releasing frequent
>experimental micro (2.x.y) releases as a substitute for alpha/beta
>releases, and then at some point declare it stable.
I like this approach because it matches what the community seems to
actually be doing: the latest release is "experimental" until told
otherwise. (Though who decides when it stops being experimental?
Everyone here on python-dev thought 2.2 was OK, and I use 2.2 every
day without pain, so I don't really know what people are complaining
about.)
--amk (www.amk.ca)
... like a bull in a barber shop.
-- The Doctor, in "Time and the Rani"
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4