>>>>> "SM" == Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> writes: GvR> Or maybe 2.3 should become 2.2.3. <0.5 wink> BAW> I think the new bool type has already prevented that. SM> Why? If you postulate that 2.even.x become the experimental SM> release branches, then 2.2.3 with a bool type makes perfect SM> sense. Given that interpretation, I'd agree. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4