From: Samuele Pedroni <pedroni@inf.ethz.ch> >From David Abrahams <david.abrahams@rcn.com> > > > > Is it just me, or are docstrings less-convenient than comments? Any > > thought given to reST-processing a module's comments? > > > > Maybe it's just me but I would be more happy to optionally > be able to write reST inside comments instead of docstrings > and have it extracted from there. That means > the comment would take the place of the secondary > docstring. > that means optionally e.g: # identifiable heavy reST # def f(... """plain text or light reST""" vs. def f(.. """plain text or light reST""" """heavy reST""" regards.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4