[Aahz] > ... > I am not talking about some abstract general case; it looks to me that in > this specific case backward compatibility isn't an issue, and I still > have not seen any explanation for why I'm wrong. Well, give us a reason to believe you're right <wink>. Specific cases can't be decided on "general principles" -- the only way to know what vim's needs actually are is to study its source code. Have you done that? I haven't.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4