"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:
> Some form of backward compatibility boilerplate which incorporated this
> would probably be of use in allowing people to migrate - it might save
> everyone writing their own.
As I posted a few days ago, I think it would be a good idea if someone
(maybe me) wrote a header file that extension authors could bundle
with their extensions that would let them program to 2.3 memory APIs
and remain compatible all the way back to 1.5.2 (maybe further, if
that's easy).
Assuming I get this right, does this sound like a good solution?
Cheers,
M.
--
I don't remember any dirty green trousers.
-- Ian Jackson, ucam.chat
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4