[me]
> The only thing I found relevant in the PEP are
> (does this fact means something?):
>
>
> - Markup that isolates a Python identifier: interpreted text.
>
> - Markup that isolates a Python identifier and specifies its type:
> interpreted text with roles.
>
Ok there's another relevant bit:
- Markup for "tagged lists" or "label lists": field lists.
... They may be used to implement docstring
semantics, such as identifying parameters, exceptions raised,
etc.; such usage is beyond the scope of this PEP.
how many eons would pass before we see a PEP about
those *relevant* issues? Presumably JavaDoc is a good
start point for this <wink>.
More or less JavaDoc tags would map to fields, except @see
and @link that would use `interp-text` and
the various ref/links forms.
regards.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4