> Why does the community need a new structured text design? What is > wrong with existing markup methodologies? The PEP didn't answer these > with any cogent examples, IMHO. Maybe that's because it's obvious to anyone who has hung out on doc-sig long enough. Structured text is really a great idea for certain situations; reST is a much better implementation of the idea than any versions I've seen before. E.g. the ST code in Zope stinks (this is not a secret). > The only rationale that I saw was existing use: the people that > already make use of it find it natural, and everyone else has to learn > it. Maybe David needs to write up the rationale better. But I can assure you there is one. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4