[Fredrik Lundh]
> more than one way to do it. more than one concept to
> explain to newcomers. more than one "obviously correct"
> way to do things. less is more. etc.
Hmm, I'm not sure I follow.
This is Python without the PEP:
falseValues = [{}, [], 0, None]
for x in falseValues:
if not x:
print "%s is 'false'." % x
This is Python with the PEP:
falseValues = [{}, [], 0, None, False]
for x in falseValues:
if not x:
print "%s is 'false'." % x
I don't see this vast conceptual chasm between pre and post PEP that you
appear to see. Please help me understand.
Would the above be clearer if I called the collection of false values
'nothingValues' instead? I, personally, don't think so.
// mark
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4