On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Tim Peters wrote: > > So now I'd like to choose between enumerate() and indexer(). Any > > closing arguments? > > I'm leaving that quote anonymous so nobody gives it more or less weight than > it deserves <wink>. I prefer enumerate(), because a transitive verb is more > appropriate than a noun. OTOH, enumerate() is just a fancy pants way of > saying "countoff()", which is nicely confusable with operator.countOf if > you're tired <wink>. I know i'm late for this party, but i'd like to introduce 'itemize()'. "Everybody, itemize(). Itemize(), everybody. Pleased to meetcha, i'm sure." Nice thing about itemize is it turns values into key/value tuples, much like .items() on various sequences. -- Ken klm@zope.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4