[David Abrahams] > I missed what this function does, x(seq) returns [(0, seq[0]), (1, seq[1]), ...] > but: > > "indexer" is a noun. I like it provided the function returns an > indexer(). Otherwise, I'm not too sure. Yeah, that's my main problem with it. > "enumerate()" sounds like it returns a list of the elements, or is > an iterator interface over the elements. Looking it up at > http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary > shows that it is dangerously close to meaning what we want to say. I say > "dangerously" because it *doesn't* mean what we want to say, and I think > a close-but-not-quite meaning is probably much worse than calling it > wafflebird. I don't know. > unfortunately, numerate and itemize both mean about the same... Numerate is obscure, but itemize() has potential! --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4