Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-September/017486.html below:
[Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/sandbox/Lib README,NONE,1.1 davlib.py,NONE,1.1 httpx.py,NONE,1.1
[Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/sandbox/Lib README,NONE,1.1 davlib.py,NONE,1.1 httpx.py,NONE,1.1Barry A. Warsaw barry@zope.com
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:07:05 -0400
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/sandbox/Lib README,NONE,1.1 davlib.py,NONE,1.1 httpx.py,NONE,1.1
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/sandbox/Lib README,NONE,1.1 davlib.py,NONE,1.1 httpx.py,NONE,1.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "KM" == Ken Manheimer <klm@zope.com> writes:
KM> Again, i don't mean to insist on using branches instead of the
KM> sandbox. I guess my concern is that branches do offer wins in
KM> some cases, particularly for stuff that is clearly on track to
KM> be incorporated...
The other problem with branches is that they get much less testing
than the trunk. I think people in general don't check out branches
unless they have to <wink>.
Using the sandbox is great for small, single modules. I'd prefer to
see larger candidates use something like SF to prototype.
-Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/sandbox/Lib README,NONE,1.1 davlib.py,NONE,1.1 httpx.py,NONE,1.1
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/nondist/sandbox/Lib README,NONE,1.1 davlib.py,NONE,1.1 httpx.py,NONE,1.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4