Eric, are you interested in pursuing this discussion further? You stopped replying, but that could be due to the holiday weekend. Anyway, the conclusion seems to be: - You violated the process as commonly understood by checking in a new module without sufficient consensus. - What you checked in is no good; it needs to be redesigned and renamed. - If you absolutely do not want to use the patch manager for this, you can check it in under the nondist/sandbox part of the tree. You can move your code to the sandbox, or I can delete it for you. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4