> Does this (untested) code make sense as a possible addition to statcache? For me, statcache was a failed experiment. What's the use you have in mind? Why can't you use os.lstat() directly? > One obvious problem I see is that if stat(path) had been called before > lstat(path), you'd pull the wrong info out of the cache. You could get > around this by maintaining separate stat and lstat caches or caching a > different key (e.g. (path, "l")) for the lstat variety. Definitely use two caches or a separate key. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4