Attached is the latest version of PEP 274 for dictionary
comprehensions, similar to list comprehensions. The first version of
this PEP wasn't posted here, but several people saw the cvs checkin
and sent in comments, which have now been incorporated.
Enjoy,
-Barry
-------------------- snip snip --------------------
PEP: 274
Title: Dict Comprehensions
Version: $Revision: 1.2 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2001/10/29 18:46:59 $
Author: barry@zope.com (Barry A. Warsaw)
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Created: 25-Oct-2001
Python-Version: 2.3
Post-History: 29-Oct-2001
Abstract
PEP 202 introduces a syntactical extension to Python called the
"list comprehension"[1]. This PEP proposes a similar syntactical
extension called the "dictionary comprehension" or "dict
comprehension" for short. You can use dict comprehensions in ways
very similar to list comprehensions, except that they produce
Python dictionary objects instead of list objects.
Proposed Solution
Dict comprehensions are just like list comprehensions, except that
you group the expression using curly braces instead of square
braces. Also, the left part before the `for' keyword expresses
both a key and a value, separated by a colon. (There is an
optional part of this PEP that allows you to use a shortcut to
express just the value.) The notation is specifically designed to
remind you of list comprehensions as applied to dictionaries.
Rationale
There are times when you have some data arranged as a sequences of
length-2 sequences, and you want to turn that into a dictionary.
In Python 2.2, the dictionary() constructor will take an optional
keyword argument that indicates specifically to interpret a
sequences of length-2 sequences as key/value pairs, and turn them
into a dictionary.
However, the act of turning some data into a sequence of length-2
sequences can be inconvenient or inefficient from a memory or
performance standpoint. Also, for some common operations, such as
turning a list of things into a set of things for quick duplicate
removal or set inclusion tests, a better syntax can help code
clarity.
As with list comprehensions, an explicit for loop can always be
used (and in fact was the only way to do it in earlier versions of
Python). But as with list comprehensions, dict comprehensions can
provide a more syntactically succinct idiom that the traditional
for loop.
Examples
>>> print {i : chr(65+i) for i in range(4)}
{0 : 'A', 1 : 'B', 2 : 'C', 3 : 'D'}
>>> print {k : v for k, v in someDict.iteritems()} == someDict.copy()
1
>>> print {x.lower() : 1 for x in list_of_email_addrs}
{'barry@zope.com' : 1, 'barry@python.org' : 1, 'guido@python.org' : 1}
>>> def invert(d):
... return {v : k for k, v in d.iteritems()}
...
>>> d = {0 : 'A', 1 : 'B', 2 : 'C', 3 : 'D'}
>>> print invert(d)
{'A' : 0, 'B' : 1, 'C' : 2, 'D' : 3}
Open Issues
- There is one further shortcut we could adopt. Suppose we wanted
to create a set of items, such as in the "list_of_email_addrs"
example above. Here, we're simply taking the target of the for
loop and turning that into the key for the dict comprehension.
The assertion is that this would be a common idiom, so the
shortcut below allows for an easy spelling of it, by allow us to
omit the "key :" part of the left hand clause:
>>> print {1 for x in list_of_email_addrs}
{'barry@zope.com' : 1, 'barry@python.org' : 1, 'guido@python.org' : 1}
Or say we wanted to map email addresses to the MX record handling
their mail:
>>> print {mx_for_addr(x) for x in list_of_email_addrs}
{'barry@zope.com' : 'mail.zope.com',
'barry@python.org' : 'mail.python.org,
'guido@python.org' : 'mail.python.org,
}
Questions: what about nested loops? Where does the key come
from? The shortcut probably doesn't save much typing, and comes
at the expense of legibility, so it's of dubious value.
- Should nested for loops be allowed? The following example,
taken from an earlier revision of this PEP illustrates the
problem:
>>> print {k, v for k in range(4) for v in range(-4, 0, 1)}
The intent of this example was to produce a mapping from a
number to its negative, but this code doesn't work because -- as
in list comprehensions -- the for loops are nested, not in
parallel! So the value of this expression is actually
{0: -1, 1: -1, 2: -1, 3: -1}
which seems of dubious value. For symmetry with list
comprehensions, perhaps this should be allowed, but it might be
better to disallow this syntax.
Implementation
The semantics of dictionary comprehensions can actually be modeled
in stock Python 2.2, by passing a list comprehension to the
builtin dictionary constructor:
>>> dictionary([(i, chr(65+i)) for i in range(4)])
This has two dictinct disadvantages from the proposed syntax
though. First, it's isn't as legible as a dict comprehension.
Second, it forces the programmer to create an in-core list object
first, which could be expensive.
References
[1] PEP 202, List Comprehensions
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0202.html
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
fill-column: 70
End:
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4