On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 08:06:28AM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > [me, in response to a remark from Marc-André]
> > What would be your suggestions? Would you prefer to go in the direction
> > of my original proposal - only providing a SSL API, but not the
> > implementation?
>
> Yes, that's how the current SSL support works -- you need to link in
> openssl.
So, as long as there are no actual cryptographic algorithms in the
Python source tree, but only hooks for OpenSSL, there's no problem?
If this is the case, then there would only be an issue for binary
distributions of Python, which can be built easily in free countries :-)
Gerhard
--
mail: gerhard <at> bigfoot <dot> de registered Linux user #64239
web: http://www.cs.fhm.edu/~ifw00065/ OpenPGP public key id 86AB43C0
public key fingerprint: DEC1 1D02 5743 1159 CD20 A4B6 7B22 6575 86AB 43C0
reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,map(lambda x:chr(ord(x)^42),tuple('zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b')))
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4