+1 on finditer.
[/F]
> ...
> will have to think about scanner; I agree that it may seem to
> be vaguely useful, but cannot think of a use case that isn't
> better handled by findall/split/sub or iterfind. can anyone?
It's in desperate need of usage docs. The few times I recall seeing it
mentioned on c.l.py, it was from someone staring at the code unable to
reverse-engineer its intended use. Therefore I don't believe it's gotten a
good trial, and so I'm at best -0 on making it official now. In my own
stuff I've built directly on top of .lastindex/.lastgroup instead -- perhaps
only because it's easier to remember how to use your own undocumented stuff
than somebody else's <wink>.
the-folks-most-likely-to-use-a-framework-are-those-most-likely-to-
write-their-own-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4