> > Is the list of subtypable types now complete (for 2.2), > > or do you indend to do more? > > I just found a few extension modules that define their own types, like > SocketType. I'd like to see those converted. I don't know if I have > time. At what point can we consider the API stable? All this inheriting and subtyping seems like it would be absolutely brilliant for the Mac toolbox APIs (and I suspect also for the PythonWin API's, Mark?) but I've refrained from even looking at it (well, I did have a quick peek:-), because (a) I have no time, (b) I don't want to chase a changing API and (c) there's some methodchain-based poor-mans-inheritance in there already that will undoubtedly break. -- Jack Jansen | ++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++ Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com | ++++ if you agree copy these lines to your sig ++++ www.cwi.nl/~jack | see http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4