> as you might have noticed, I went ahead and checked in code > for "finditer". nobody has complained this far ;-) Far from it. :-) > isn't "iterfind" a better name, btw? more like "iterkeys" (etc). > > if nobody complains, I'll change the name, and check in some > documentation. Hm, but finditer() is more like findall(), and that counts more I'd say. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4