> The bonehead who uses sendall with a non-blocking socket
> will, of course, get an EWOULDBLOCK (or platform
> equivalent) on an oversize send. Maybe EWOULDBLOCK
> should get turned into ButtHeadProgrammerError("Don't use
> sendall with a non-blocking socket")?
I think natural selection will take care of this breed. :-)
> [I agree that this is the best way to fix the std lib, and that it is
> very important that it be fixed.]
Thanks!
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4