> >Alas, this is one of the things that don't work yet. To set and get > > Oh, well; I need to come up with a different example for subclassing a > built-in type, then. Thanks! <puts on thinking cap> You can use a similar example but not override __getitem__ / __setitem__; instead, add some new methods (e.g. merge() -- like update() but the existing key wins). --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4