[Jeremy] > Do you have an opinion on the recent change to traceback.c (make it > collectable)? I think it's a good candidate for 2.1.2 even though it > doesn't meet the criteria above :-). Guido's right: that change alone won't do any good. Frame objects need to be chased by gc too, else the cycle would survive. However, adding frame objects to gc caused a measurable slowdown, which I judged tolerable in 2.2 because 2.2 got enough non-bugfix speedup work to cancel it out (at the time -- I expect we're losing again by now). if-it-ain't-a-pure-self-contained-bugfix-it's-dubious-at-best-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4