A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-October/018082.html below:

[Python-Dev] Goals for patch selection for 2.1.2

[Python-Dev] Goals for patch selection for 2.1.2 [Python-Dev] Goals for patch selection for 2.1.2Guido van Rossum guido@python.org
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:41:16 -0400
> If you want systematic scanning, we could try to come up with a script
> that automatically reviews all commit messages of patches since 2.1.1
> whether these mention an SF bug. We could then further automate
> scanning to produce the number of changed lines, to exclude 'large'
> changes.

Slightly dangerous though -- some bugfixes were never reported to SF.

> Perhaps anybody in the readership of this software already has code
> that does such things?

No, but you can start with Tools/scripts/logmerge.py which parses CVS
log output and sorts it by date.

The best way to scan for SF patch refs is probably to search for
6-digit numbers...  There's too much diversity otherwise in the SF
references :-(

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4