A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-October/018057.html below:

[Python-Dev] should I check in this test_xmlrpc test case change?

[Python-Dev] should I check in this test_xmlrpc test case change? [Python-Dev] should I check in this test_xmlrpc test case change?Guido van Rossum guido@python.org
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:50:13 -0400
> When I made the latest change to xmlrpclib.py (to test for integer
> overflow), I also expanded the test_xmlrpc.py file.  Unfortunately, I forgot
> to check it in.  Should I do that now or file it as a separate patch?

Assuming that it works for you :-), check it in to the trunk.  It won't
make it into 2.2b1, but it will be ready for 2.2b2.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4