A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-October/018052.html below:

[Python-Dev] Goals for patch selection for 2.1.2

[Python-Dev] Goals for patch selection for 2.1.2 [Python-Dev] Goals for patch selection for 2.1.2Fred L. Drake, Jr. fdrake@acm.org
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:52:58 -0400
Martin von Loewis writes:
 > One open issue would be to come up with a release schedule. Should
 > you restrict yourself to patches that also appear in 2.2 (perhaps in
 > a back-ported fashion), or will you give a deadline for new patches

  Since the point of a strictly bug-fix release is to fix bugs, I
would not tie the 2.1.2 release to 2.2 in any way.  The 2.2
developments remain a cheap source of bug fixes, though, so anything
that was an actual bug fix should be considered for 2.1.2.  If an
alternate fix is needed because the codebase changed too much (which
may be very possible this time), a completely new patch may be
needed.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4