Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Even after reading Daniel's passionate plea, if(cond,expr,expr) looks
> ugly to me. It also doesn't solve the parsing ambiguity problem -- it
> still can't be allowed in an expression that starts a line because the
> parser doesn't know whether it's an if expression or an if statement
> without many tokens of lookahead.
This can be solved by simply choosing a different name:
iif(cond, expr, expr)
when(cond, expr, expr)
cond(cond, expr, expr)
check(cond, expr, expr)
...
> So, -1 for if(cond,expr,expr).
Bye,
Walter Dörwald
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4