Paul Svensson wrote: > so I guess don't have the understanding of the motivation > behind the proposal that I could have had. Because: a and b or c burns you when b evaluates to false, but (a and [b] or [c])[0] is a monstrosity. And yes, people do that. - Gordon
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4