Tim> I don't know -- I'm not an xmlrpc guy. My guess, though, is that Tim> we should refuse to produce anything that doesn't meet the letter Tim> of the spec (although "the spec" in this case leaves oodles of Tim> stuff un-spec-ified, it seemed clear about the limitation to 4 Tim> bytes for ints; OTOH, IIRC it didn't specify 2's-complement ints, Tim> and if not we can only guess at the intended limits). yeah, the spec is pretty casual. As for twos-complement, it's not needed. Everything is ascii... ;-) Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4