Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Now that the introduction of a class hierarchy is dead, Is it ? I didn't see any messages on the list saying that the idea is dead -- only that a PEP is needed and that it cannot be done for 2.2. > I'd like to > move forward with the isinstance(x, (A, B, C...)) patch. > > Followup question: should I also implement issubclass(X, (A, B, C...))? > > It's consistent to do so, but it's more work (issubclass is a bit > murkier due to the "abstract subclass" support), and I'm not sure that > it has the same benefits... -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Consulting & Company: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4