"M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > > "James C. Ahlstrom" wrote: > > 3) Package import is not implemented in C, it is implemented > > by a Python module which is part of the standard library. > > Why ? I don't see a need for that and it would slow down > package imports which are becoming increasingly popular as the > Python code base grows. Well, I looked at import.c and adding zip files with subdirectories will be a mess. The path searches would have to be extended to zip files. Moving out the package code would be a great simplification. Or maybe I am lazy. It doesn't help that I don't really understand packages. Your point about efficiency is a good one though, but I am not sure of the magnitude of the slow down. Anyone else have an opinion? JimA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4