> > *** 1805,1810 ****
> > --- 1805,1829 ----
> > else if (PyType_Check(cls)) {
> > retval = PyObject_TypeCheck(inst, (PyTypeObject *)cls);
> > }
> > + else if (PySequence_Check(cls)) {
> > + int i, n;
>
> Is is possible that a type also passes PySequence_Check? If so, that
> could lead to confusing behavior.
The only way a type could pass PySequence_Check is if someone
subclasses 'type' and adds a __getitem__ method. In that case, it's
appropriate that PyType_Check() has prevalence. Also, adding
__getitem__ to a type seems to serve no purpose, so I'm not worried
about this (and yes, I had thought about this :-).
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4