mal> Hmm, you cannot really compare these numbers though, since the two
mal> runs use two different sets of parsers. Have you checked using
mal> SgmlopParser with the 0.9.8 version of xmlrpclib ?
They are the same parser. I forgot to mention that. What is called
"FastParser" in 0.9.8 is called SgmlopParser in the CVS version. That has a
different thing called "FastParser". I believe it is the thing you can get
by contacting Pythonware.
mal> There's also a project on SF called py-xmlrpc which uses a C
mal> implementation as basis and is said to be much faster than
mal> xmlrpclib (at least that's what they quote on their web-page).
Yes, it is. Amazingly enough, the guy who wrote it (Shilad Sen at
Sourcelight Technologies) works in the same building I do (and it's a pretty
small building). We had lunch last week and talked a bit about it. It
doesn't yet do Unicode. I sent Shilad my little test script. He modified
it to use his parser. His results suggest that py-xmlrpc is about as fast
as cPickle.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4